When Arland Bruce III first came to the Ticats - amid a fairly substantial media frenzy - I figured he was an early Christmas present, a quote and controversy machine that would keep me cranking out colourful copy until the cows came home.
And so, like most other members of the football press, I spent a good deal of time baiting him with a microphone in his face, asking him leading questions in hops of securing that killer quote.
In the year-plus I've covered him, he's given me something truly juicy just once: his comments after the loss to Winnipeg late last season when he said it was time to replace Quinton Porter with Keven Glenn. He was frustrated and his emotions got the best of him - and even then, he said it while trying to respect Porter and the decision-making of the coaches. He was also right.
The one thing I didn't expect - and I led my story in today's Spec with it - was that Bruce is a sublime practice player, one of the few guys worth watching because he's usually got at least one amazing catch in him per day. But more than that, he practiced hard every single play. This is the pros and most guys go hard but he was also focused - he does not, as a general rule, drop balls.
As more of the Andrus story trickled out, it became apparent to me that Bruce had been unfairly painted as a malcontent. I've documented some the details in previous postings, but they are much more favourable to Bruce than they are to Andrus - and almost wholly unreported.
Once I'd come to those conclusions, I knew I wanted to write about Bruce, in for no other reason than to show this other side of him. Then a colleague, a Spec copy editor and rabid Cat fan Gary Curtis - a guy who has been so monumentally helpful in my development as a beat reporter I couldn't ever buy him enough Hawaiian shirts as a thank you - found this story, a retrospective from a reporter who covered Bruce in high school and stumbled across an NFL Network broadcast of a recent game.
That story galvanized my thinking even further. It explained a lot about Bruce's work ethic and about his reaction to the Andrus thing. When you've worked your ass off, despite repeated setbacks, to make it, you keep working. And you certainly don't appreciate being labeled unprofessional when being a professional was all you wanted to be and what you worked so hard for.
But despite my best of intentions, the story almost didn't happen. When the Ticat media relations guy, Scott McNaughton, told Arland that I wanted to do a story on him and gave him a rough idea as to what it was about, Arland turned it down. Scott asked Arland to talk to me about it, essentially giving me a chance to pitch him on the story. We talked and he agreed.
As much as I respect how far he's come, I was also extremely careful not to portray Arland as something he isn't. I don't pretend to know the real Arland Bruce and I still don't have as clear a sense of the man as I would like to. The other major profiles I've done - Cobb, Porter, Bellefeuille, Glenn - I've felt more comfortable that I knew who they were at the end of the process - s much as any reporter can. Arland isn't like that. He's a complicated guy, I think, and I wanted what I wrote to be true.
That said, I'm extremely grateful to Arland for his time and candour. Talking about your difficult childhood isn't easy and he struggled at times to articulate himself. And if there's anybody who has the right to mistrust the press, it's AB3.
And never again will I try and trap Arland Bruce. First of all, he's wayyyyy too smart for that - I've come to understand that, with a few rare and emotional exceptions, he only ever says exactly what he wants to. But more importantly, I know now that he's mildly insulted by it, though he'd never say so.
In other words, it's time to Arland Bruce III just a little more credit.